Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William Charles George James Joseph Frank Henry Thomas Harry |
Number 464 330 218 214 199 189 149 116 102 89 |
1880
|
Female Mary Anna Elizabeth Margaret Minnie Emma Martha Alice Marie Annie, Sarah (tie) |
Number 176 77 53 49 42 41 38 37 33 30 |
Total sample size: 4770 males, 2360 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William Charles James George Joseph Frank Henry Edward, Harry, Thomas (tie) |
Number 390 303 220 216 203 157 148 109 95 |
1881
|
Female Mary Anna Elizabeth Margaret Emma Minnie Sarah Alice Bertha Grace |
Number 201 87 55 54 48 44 40 37 36 34 |
Total sample size: 4563 males, 2509 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William Charles James George Frank Joseph Henry Thomas Harry |
Number 463 406 214 202 198 188 182 109 105 97 |
1882
|
Female Mary Anna Elizabeth Emma, Margaret (tie) Minnie Bertha Mabel Florence, Ida (tie) |
Number 218 115 65 57 54 46 43 42 |
Total sample size: 5267 males, 3051 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William Charles George James Joseph Frank Harry, Henry (tie) Edward |
Number 404 391 238 210 204 186 181 110 107 |
1883
|
Female Mary Anna Margaret Emma Elizabeth Florence Bertha Alice Sarah Clara, Rose (tie) |
Number 240 147 65 53 50 47 45 41 40 39 |
Total sample size: 5138 males, 3143 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William George Charles James Frank Joseph Harry Henry Thomas |
Number 534 407 256 247 236 207 198 147 131 120 |
1884
|
Female Mary Anna Elizabeth Emma Margaret Minnie Alice, Florence (tie) Clara Bertha, Rose (tie) |
Number 298 136 93 68 65 63 50 47 46 |
Total sample size: 5918 males, 3745 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William Charles Joseph George, James (tie) Frank Robert Henry Edward |
Number 515 394 258 236 234 174 127 122 118 |
1885
|
Female Mary Anna Elizabeth Margaret Emma Ida Rose Minnie Bertha Annie |
Number 302 161 85 74 73 66 61 57 56 54 |
Total sample size: 6032 males, 4001 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William George James Charles Joseph Frank Henry Thomas Edward, Walter (tie) |
Number 574 463 287 249 234 232 204 129 128 118 |
1886
|
Female Mary Anna Elizabeth Emma Clara Margaret Minnie Bertha Rose Ida, Sarah (tie) |
Number 268 171 91 80 66 65 63 62 55 54 |
Total sample size: 6298 males, 4256 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William George Charles James Frank, Joseph (tie) Harry Robert Thomas |
Number 494 399 249 237 234 208 137 122 114 |
1887
|
Female Mary Anna Emma Margaret Bertha Elizabeth, Minnie (tie) Florence Mabel Bessie, Helen, Jennie (tie) |
Number 328 190 79 74 72 70 55 54 53 |
Total sample size: 6143 males, 4511 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William George Joseph James Charles Frank Harry Robert Thomas |
Number 630 438 313 285 283 258 222 173 141 139 |
1888
|
Female Mary Anna Margaret Elizabeth Bertha Emma Ethel Rose Bessie Ida, Minnie (tie) |
Number 367 189 102 94 89 84 74 73 72 63 |
Total sample size: 7424 males, 5385 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William George James Charles Joseph Frank Harry Edward Robert |
Number 581 446 280 277 264 250 231 148 142 136 |
1889
|
Female Mary Anna Elizabeth Margaret Minnie Helen, Rose (tie) Bertha Alice, Emma (tie) |
Number 371 204 108 96 79 72 71 70 |
Total sample size: 6992 males, 5429 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James George Charles Joseph Frank Harry Henry Edward |
Number 557 402 274 265 262 258 206 180 152 130 |
1890
|
Female Mary Anna Elizabeth Emma Margaret Rose Ethel Florence Ida Bertha, Helen (tie) |
Number 400 188 113 95 93 89 86 84 77 75 |
Total sample size: 7204 males, 5847 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James George Joseph Charles Frank Henry Harry Robert |
Number 574 408 271 259 253 251 224 149 144 136 |
1891
|
Female Mary Anna Margaret Florence Elizabeth Clara Rose Helen Emma, Ethel (tie) |
Number 401 230 103 90 87 84 83 81 80 |
Total sample size: 7095 males, 5909 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James George, Joseph (tie) Charles Frank Harry Thomas Robert |
Number 633 459 298 276 264 236 187 174 151 |
1892
|
Female Mary Anna Margaret Florence Elizabeth Rose Ruth Ethel Helen, Minnie (tie) |
Number 430 231 109 103 97 93 92 89 88 |
Total sample size: 8222 males, 6630 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William George Joseph Charles James Frank Edward Thomas Walter |
Number 549 491 296 293 259 242 227 164 151 139 |
1893
|
Female Mary Anna Margaret Elizabeth Helen Ruth Florence Bertha Ethel Rose |
Number 395 214 122 114 111 103 101 93 89 81 |
Total sample size: 7963 males, 6770 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William George James Joseph Charles Frank Harry Thomas Robert |
Number 572 427 304 279 267 258 236 182 163 156 |
1894
|
Female Mary Anna Margaret Helen Elizabeth Ruth Florence Ethel Marie Rose |
Number 438 244 150 140 132 120 100 90 85 84 |
Total sample size: 8072 males, 7154 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James, Joseph (tie) George Charles Frank Henry, Walter (tie) Harry |
Number 581 457 296 288 244 218 176 152 |
1895
|
Female Mary Anna Elizabeth Helen Ruth Margaret Florence Marie, Rose (tie) Ethel |
Number 441 243 139 136 119 114 104 101 98 |
Total sample size: 8645 males, 7748 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male William John James George Joseph Frank Charles Harry Robert Edward |
Number 573 540 326 311 264 225 215 166 161 154 |
1896
|
Female Mary Anna Helen Margaret Ruth Marie Elizabeth Rose Ethel Florence |
Number 428 225 147 138 130 117 108 106 103 102 |
Total sample size: 9035 males, 7861 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James George Joseph Charles Frank Robert Harry Edward |
Number 514 462 321 280 240 238 189 160 152 141 |
1897
|
Female Mary Anna Helen Ruth Margaret Florence Rose Marie Elizabeth Lillian |
Number 422 214 151 149 116 109 108 107 99 87 |
Total sample size: 8910 males, 7778 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William George James Joseph Charles Frank Edward Robert Henry |
Number 547 463 330 312 268 242 217 164 154 141 |
1898
|
Female Mary Anna Helen Margaret Ruth Elizabeth Florence Rose Lillian Ethel, Marie (tie) |
Number 488 224 183 160 144 122 120 99 98 94 |
Total sample size: 9496 males, 8768 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William George James Joseph Charles Frank Robert Henry Edward |
Number 516 456 292 260 230 212 201 179 162 161 |
1899
|
Female Mary Anna Margaret Helen Marie Elizabeth Florence Ruth Ethel Alice |
Number 431 223 161 156 133 126 110 109 106 88 |
Total sample size: 8845 males, 8222 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James George Charles Joseph Frank Henry Robert Harry |
Number 559 421 297 282 235 210 191 168 167 135 |
1900
|
Female Mary Helen Anna Margaret Ruth Elizabeth Marie Rose Florence Bertha |
Number 460 210 201 163 152 138 130 123 107 103 |
Total sample size: 8891 males, 9355 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James Joseph George Charles Frank Henry Robert Edward |
Number 412 408 250 210 202 198 171 138 134 124 |
1901 |
Female Mary Helen Anna Margaret Elizabeth Ruth Marie Gladys Florence Rose |
Number 438 202 176 149 121 119 114 103 99 88 |
Total sample size: 7945 males, 8499 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James George Joseph Charles Robert Frank Edward Walter |
Number 522 394 305 255 238 225 181 172 151 149 |
1902 |
Female Mary Helen Anna Margaret Ruth Elizabeth Marie Lillian Florence Alice, Rose (tie) |
Number 454 216 195 190 134 131 122 111 107 101 |
Total sample size: 8890 males, 9378 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James George Joseph Charles Robert Frank Walter Henry |
Number 481 355 293 268 232 210 186 149 130 126 |
1903 |
Female Mary Margaret Helen Anna Ruth Marie Elizabeth Florence Dorothy Lillian |
Number 481 203 200 187 166 136 127 122 120 115 |
Total sample size: 8849 males, 9519 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William George, James (tie) Joseph Charles Robert Frank Edward Walter |
Number 490 387 288 227 215 203 193 134 126 |
1904 |
Female Mary Helen Margaret Ruth Anna Dorothy, Elizabeth (tie) Marie Alice, Florence (tie) |
Number 527 219 201 178 176 131 119 113 |
Total sample size: 9330 males, 9777 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James George Charles Joseph Frank, Robert (tie) Edward Thomas |
Number 559 418 299 280 229 227 167 157 145 |
1905 |
Female Mary Helen Margaret Anna Ruth Dorothy Elizabeth Mildred Lillian Marie |
Number 493 264 215 195 154 147 129 117 116 115 |
Total sample size: 9862 males, 10354 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James Joseph George Charles Robert Frank Henry Edward |
Number 563 417 314 285 272 223 201 161 132 131 |
1906 |
Female Mary Helen Margaret Ruth Anna Elizabeth Dorothy Marie Alice Florence |
Number 568 225 202 176 168 167 154 137 136 128 |
Total sample size: 9923 males, 10413 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James George Charles Joseph Robert Frank Thomas, Walter (tie) |
Number 563 453 325 305 275 265 251 186 162 563 |
1907 |
Female Mary Helen Margaret Anna Ruth Dorothy Elizabeth Mildred Alice Ethel |
Number 543 255 219 187 179 178 137 134 128 125 |
Total sample size: 10604 males, 10712 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James George Joseph Charles Robert Frank Edward Henry |
Number 584 428 343 304 297 276 252 209 198 147 |
1908
|
Female Mary Helen Margaret Anna Ruth Dorothy Elizabeth Mildred Frances Florence |
Number 581 262 220 217 203 188 165 138 137 130 |
Total sample size: 10932 males, 11265 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James George Joseph Robert Charles Frank Edward Henry, Walter (tie) |
Number 575 504 392 302 298 264 257 191 186 146 |
1909
|
Female Mary Helen Margaret Dorothy, Ruth (tie) Anna Elizabeth Mildred Marie Alice |
Number 569 327 216 204 194 167 164 142 139 |
Total sample size: 10956 males, 11460 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James Robert Joseph Charles, George (tie) Edward Frank Henry |
Number 574 441 414 287 273 270 187 181 145 |
1910
|
Female Mary Helen Margaret Dorothy, Ruth (tie) Anna Mildred Elizabeth Alice Ethel |
Number 606 307 249 201 190 185 148 131 130 |
Total sample size: 11564 males, 12059 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James Joseph Charles, Robert (tie) George Frank Edward Walter |
Number 601 479 375 315 268 267 214 210 149 |
1911
|
Female Mary Helen Dorothy, Margaret (tie) Ruth Anna Mildred Elizabeth Marie Gladys |
Number 592 294 251 223 194 171 150 124 123 |
Total sample size: 11316 males, 11659 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James Robert George Joseph Charles Frank Edward Thomas, Walter (tie) |
Number 667 508 425 323 312 295 286 213 205 147 |
1912
|
Female Mary Helen Dorothy Ruth Margaret Anna Mildred Frances Elizabeth Marie |
Number 641 389 258 246 242 193 186 168 165 144 |
Total sample size: 12342 males, 12526 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James Robert Joseph Charles George Frank Edward Thomas |
Number 622 497 416 357 327 308 297 223 198 163 |
1913
|
Female Mary Helen Dorothy Margaret Ruth Mildred Elizabeth Anna Marie Florence |
Number 632 371 283 275 212 191 179 160 147 127 |
Total sample size: 12416 males, 12347 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James Robert Joseph George Charles Frank Edward Walter |
Number 703 536 463 387 353 351 286 232 229 202 |
1914
|
Female Mary Helen Dorothy Margaret Ruth Mildred Anna Elizabeth Evelyn Marie |
Number 714 352 311 290 225 210 184 165 150 147 |
Total sample size: 13423 males, 13171 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James Robert Joseph Charles George Edward Frank Thomas |
Number 649 554 459 412 324 323 312 250 220 178 |
1915
|
Female Mary Helen Dorothy Margaret Ruth Anna Mildred Evelyn Virginia Elizabeth |
Number 666 407 319 281 242 193 182 159 151 147 |
Total sample size: 13218 males, 13195 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James Robert Charles George Joseph Edward Frank Walter |
Number 728 550 484 424 359 343 316 231 205 171 |
1916
|
Female Mary Helen Margaret Dorothy Ruth Mildred Anna Frances Elizabeth Marie |
Number 725 384 321 300 249 174 172 165 159 136 |
Total sample size: 13410 males, 13125 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James Robert Joseph George Charles Edward Frank Thomas, Walter (tie) |
Number 690 592 520 445 336 317 309 207 206 164 |
1917
|
Female Mary Helen Dorothy Margaret Ruth Anna Frances Elizabeth Mildred Marie |
Number 752 366 356 334 267 204 171 162 155 151 |
Total sample size: 13291 males, 13691 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William Robert James Joseph Charles George Edward Frank Thomas |
Number 726 585 512 511 352 342 336 251 246 177 |
1918
|
Female Mary Helen Dorothy Margaret Ruth Frances Virginia Anna Mildred Elizabeth |
Number 750 430 372 315 309 203 201 189 184 180 |
Total sample size: 14414 males, 14689 females
Rank 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
Male John William James Robert Charles Joseph George Edward Frank Thomas |
Number 723 550 531 523 350 316 304 248 195 190 |
1919
|
Female Mary Helen Dorothy Margaret Ruth Virginia Elizabeth Mildred Frances Anna |
Number 723 363 340 328 286 184 182 180 176 175 |
Total sample size: 14062 males, 14190 females